Making large changes in small, safe steps for Responsible AI program implementation

The principle of "large changes in small, safe steps" is a strategic approach that combines the ambition of transformative change with the caution of incremental implementation. This method can significantly enhance the effectiveness of Responsible AI (RAI) program implementation by balancing innovation and risk management.

 

Key takeaways

The "large changes in small safe steps" approach leads to more successful program implementation by effectively mitigating risks, enhancing stakeholder engagement and trust, and ensuring sustainable and scalable adoption of new practices. This strategic method balances innovation with caution, fostering a resilient and adaptive framework for Responsible AI programs.

 

Why should we adopt an incremental approach?

This approach leads to more successful program implementation by effectively mitigating risks, enhancing stakeholder engagement and trust, and ensuring sustainable and scalable adoption of new practices.

1. Risk Mitigation and Management: Implementing changes incrementally allows for testing in controlled environments, minimizing the exposure to potential risks. This approach ensures that any negative impacts are contained and manageable. Small steps enable early detection of issues, allowing for timely interventions and adjustments before scaling. This reduces the likelihood of significant setbacks or failures. Continuous risk assessments and adjustments at each phase build a more resilient and adaptive system capable of handling unforeseen challenges more effectively.

2. Enhanced Stakeholder Engagement and Trust: Regular updates and transparent communication throughout the incremental process build trust among stakeholders. This engagement ensures that all parties are informed and supportive of the changes. Involving a diverse group of stakeholders in each step fosters a sense of ownership and collaboration. Their feedback is crucial for refining and improving the program, leading to better outcomes. Incremental success showcases the organization’s commitment to responsible practices, enhancing its reputation and stakeholder confidence in the long-term vision.

3. Sustainable and Scalable Implementation: Phased implementation allows the organization to gradually adapt to new practices and technologies, ensuring that changes are sustainable and integrated smoothly into existing systems. Successful pilots and phased rollouts provide a proven framework that can be scaled effectively. This ensures that the organization can handle larger implementations without compromising on quality or effectiveness. Each step serves as a learning opportunity, allowing for continuous improvement and refinement. This iterative process ensures that the program evolves with the organization’s needs and external developments.


So what does this approach look like in practice?

From experience having helped many organizations set up and scale their RAI programs, there isn’t one gold-standard approach that fits everybody but there are a few essential elements that create the fundamental basis for a sustainable and successful RAI program.

Incremental Innovation: While it is very tempting to come in and start with a flash-bang to implement sweeping changes across the organization, often in reality we find that there is a lot of inertia to the adoption of new practices and processes amongst staff, particularly when something is not central to their everyday responsibilities. To counter this inertia effectively, we can engage in piloting some of these changes and establishing strong feedback loops to capture learnings from those pilots.

  1. Pilot Programs: Start with small-scale pilots to test new RAI initiatives in controlled environments. Use these pilots to gather data, identify potential risks, and refine strategies. This can take the form of asking friendly DS/ML teams to integrate simple measures like documenting potential negative impacts from their AI work and presenting that documentation in the form of a lunch-and-learn or department-wide meeting.

  2. Feedback Loops: Establish continuous feedback loops with stakeholders to ensure that each step is informed by real-world impacts and adjustments are made accordingly. Often, we get caught up in expanding the scope of the impact to be too large in the beginning (which it can definitely be depending on the kind of project that you’re working on), but we can start with something that is very tightly scoped so that we can gather the necessary feedback from whether the new processes that you’ve established are achieving the intended goals you have for them in the first place.

Scalability: A darling phrase/term in Silicon Valley, it is nonetheless very important for how successful our work will be as RAI practitioners. While some ideas look great on paper and work very well for small-scale test projects and limited teams, they may fail as you try to roll them out to different contexts, such as geographies, product areas, business units, and most importantly resource requirements to run those processes as you scale the program elements. You can manage these issues by engaging in phased rollouts that give you a greater degree of control and opportunities to course-correct and invest in tooling and other support mechanisms that ensure that resource requirements are present as needs arise during the scaling process.

  1. Phased Rollout: Gradually scale successful pilots into broader applications. This phased approach allows for the gradual absorption of new practices without overwhelming existing systems. In practice this can look like successfully taking pilots from one team to the next within a department to soak up what works and what doesn’t when you encounter different contexts, and then move towards the next layer of abstraction in the organizational hierarchy to deploy the practice/process/pilot.

  2. Scalable Infrastructure: Design RAI frameworks with scalability in mind, ensuring that policies and technologies can be expanded or adapted as needed. One of the most common points of failures is not planning for the increase in resource requirements that accompany any scaling efforts. For example, as you might scale an incident response system, you will need more people who serve on ethics committees to review the incidents to maintain response times that staff have come to expect. Preemptively planning and training staff for that is a great way to ensure that you’re ready for that when you have more people using your new system.

Risk Management: While most organizations will already have a risk management function, sometimes in the form of privacy, legal, or a dedicated unit for risk management and asset governance, you should always ensure that you’re in lock-step with them as you bring RAI to life within the organization. There is a great opportunity here to lean in on existing mechanisms that they might have in place, allowing you to avoid redundancies. It also gives you the opportunity to engage in managed testing so that you can judge whether your new process/policy is thorough and comprehensive in catching any risks that the organization will face in deploying AI.

  1. Controlled Testing: Implement changes in sandbox environments to simulate real-world conditions without exposing the organization to significant risks.

  2. Risk Assessments: Conduct thorough risk assessments at each stage, using insights from initial steps to anticipate and mitigate potential issues in subsequent phases.

Stakeholder Engagement: Often advocated in the RAI ecosystem as a necessary step for success for any RAI initiative, it is quite difficult in practice to get it right. My guidance here to practitioners is always to do this with a mindset of giving stakeholders a real seat on the table and seriously accounting for and implementing their inputs rather than just “having them in the room” so that you can check off a box on having engaged relevant stakeholders. Transparency about how the process will be run and casting the net wide to gather up the relevant stakeholders is essential to ensure diversity in the composition of the decision-making body.

  1. Inclusive Decision-Making: Engage a diverse group of stakeholders, including technologists, ethicists, and end-users, in the decision-making process to ensure that all perspectives are considered.

  2. Transparency: Maintain transparency throughout the process, regularly communicating progress, challenges, and next steps to build trust and buy-in from all parties involved.

Continuous Learning: RAI is a journey! What we mean by that it is not a one-and-done process and there will be a lot of refinement that is required as you engage with different stakeholders, integrate with existing risk management functions, and try to scale while deploying innovative approaches in an incremental fashion across the organization to meet your RAI goals. Adopting the mindset of continuous learning to improve each process/policy as you go along and engaging in capacity building so that you have more staff members who feel comfortable with RAI is a great mechanism for ensuring the longevity of your RAI program implementation.

  1. Iterative Improvement: Use each step as a learning opportunity, continuously refining and improving the RAI framework based on real-world outcomes and stakeholder feedback.

  2. Training and Education: Provide ongoing training and resources to ensure that all stakeholders are up-to-date with the latest RAI practices and understand their roles in the implementation process.


What can we do to get started?

While any program implementation is a long-term effort that requires coordination amongst multiple stakeholders as we discussed above, there are a few things you can start doing right away to lay the foundations for a nascent RAI program to succeed in the long-run.

  1. Define Clear Objectives: Establish clear, measurable objectives for each phase of the RAI implementation process.

  2. Develop a Roadmap: Create a detailed roadmap outlining each step, including pilot programs, phased rollouts, and key milestones.

  3. Set Up Governance Structures: Establish robust governance structures to oversee the implementation process, including risk management and stakeholder engagement frameworks.

  4. Monitor and Evaluate: Implement a robust monitoring and evaluation system to track progress, identify challenges, and inform decision-making.

  5. Communicate Regularly: Ensure regular communication with all stakeholders to keep them informed and engaged throughout the process.


Adopting the "large changes in small safe steps" approach can effectively balance the ambition of transformative RAI initiatives with the caution required to manage risks, ensuring a sustainable and scalable implementation process. This method not only minimizes risks but also fosters continuous learning and stakeholder engagement, essential for the success of Responsible AI programs.

Abhishek Gupta

Founder and Principal Researcher, Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Director, Responsible AI, Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

Fellow, Augmented Collective Intelligence, BCG Henderson Institute

Chair, Standards Working Group, Green Software Foundation

Author, AI Ethics Brief and State of AI Ethics Report

https://www.linkedin.com/in/abhishekguptamcgill/
Previous
Previous

Goodbye Goodhart: Escaping metrics and policy gaming in Responsible AI

Next
Next

Think further into the future: An approach to better RAI programs